Queanbeyan Palerang is among 86 councils that will be allowed to increase general rate revenue over the next financial year
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Yass Valley, Wingecarribee and Goulburn Mulwaree have also been approved to raise their rates above a 0.7 per cent rate peg handed down late last year.
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) announced on Monday that 86 NSW councils would be permitted to increase the amount they raised from general rate revenue by between 1.6pc and 2.5pc.
READ MORE: Regional filmmaker showcased at festival
The special rate variations follow concerted lobbying by councils and peak bodies at state level. They were unhappy with the 0.7pc rate peg set by IPART in March for many of them, saying it was unsustainable and would not meet service demands.
IPART relented and allowed NSW councils to plead their case for a special rate variation.
Monday's decision means:
- Goulburn Mulwaree can collect a further 2.5pc from general rate revenue
- Wingecarribee can collect an extra 2pc rather than the 1.2pc originally granted;
- Yass Valley can collect an extra 2.3pc, rather than 1.3pc;
- Queanbeyan Palerang can reap an extra 2.5pc, rather than 0.7pc originally granted.
Following the backlash, IPART says it is reviewing the rate peg methodology to deal with "volatility in economic conditions." The review will also look at the timing of the calculations in a fast-changing economic climate.
"Our review will be looking at how to deal with this challenge in the future," Tribunal member Deborah Cope said.
"...The (original) rate peg was determined in the low inflation environment at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic,"
"Since then, high inflation and global uncertainty increased councils' costs. Some councils have demonstrated that without additional funds they will not be able to deliver the projects they have already consulted on and included in their budgets."
Ms Cope said the Tribunal was careful to balance councils' needs to maintain services and investment they had already committed to against keeping rates affordable.
Councils were required to show that they had budgeted for higher income than that provided by the rate peg and that they needed the additional money to deliver on the projects they had already planned and included in their budgets.
For several, it meant two sets of rate charges had to be publicly exhibited in their budgets, which must be finalised this month.
Louise Thrower
If you have a story to tell, drop me a line at louise.thrower@austcommunitymedia.com.au or call 0418 229 678.
If you have a story to tell, drop me a line at louise.thrower@austcommunitymedia.com.au or call 0418 229 678.
